Reports prepared by the CSIRO describe the likely impacts of global warming in South Australia, for example:
The 4th Assessment Report (IPCC, 2007) of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (external site) concluded that:
Although there are skeptics, the science behind climate change in Australia is officially recognised by Commonwealth, State and Territory Governments, the National Farmers Federation and the South Australian Farmers Federation. While skeptics are quick to point out, science is not a numbers game and that majority opinions have been wrong before, it is important to note that “climate” is defined by a long series of climate patterns, over a period of 30 years or more as specified by the World Meteorological Organisation (WMO).
In South Australia, climate change presents a major challenge to agriculture in particular. Increased temperatures are expected to herald not only warmer conditions but changes in rainfall - more in some places, less in others - and increased winds, storms, fires, floods and ironically, droughts.
Conditions are expected to be complicated by secondary effects where, for example, traditional crops become impractical and new species are needed, or in trade, where competitor farmers become more productive as they discover conditions more conducive to their crops.
Opportunities may arise however: for example, global warming and the decline in global oil resources may provide opportunities for expansion into farm forestry for carbon sequestration. New crops may be planted for biofuel resources; marginal agricultural land may be used to establish wind farms to generate electricity and novel soil management techniques may also offer carbon sequestration opportunities. New markets may arise where foreign farmers are at a climate disadvantage.
The approach of the South Australian Government to climate change is three-fold: Reduce, Adapt and Innovate, that is:
Tackling Climate Change: South Australia's Greenhouse Strategy 2007 - 2020 (PDF 4.95MB) (external site) is available online. The Natural Resources section includes industries that depend on natural resources e.g. the agriculture sector.
Primary Industries and Resources SA has prepared a Climate change management framework (PDF 716.8 KB) (2011). This framework describes PIRSA’s strategy and action in primary industries and the resources sector to support ecologically and economically sustainable development under changing climatic conditions. During 2011, an Action Plan will be finalised and implemented.
Primary producers can play a role in slowing global warming and climate change by reducing greenhouse gas emissions from agricultural activities. Agriculture produces carbon dioxide (CO2) through use of energy sourced from coal and gas-fired power stations, by burning gas directly for heating and processing purposes and in fuel for travel and transport. During digestion, cattle and sheep and other ruminating animals produce methane (CH4) that is emitted as "burps" while they graze in pastures. Nitrous oxide (N2O) escapes from disturbed soil and from fertiliser that is not rapidly incorporated into the soil or taken up by plants.
Methane and nitrous oxide exist in the atmosphere in only small amounts but their "global warming potential" is high, that is, CH4 has about 21 times the effect of CO2 , while N2O has 310 times the warming potential of CO2. As a result agriculture is responsible for about 13.5% of global greenhouse gas emissions, much more than that in countries like New Zealand which are more dependent on livestock. Importantly, these emissions represent "lost" or wasted resources. The aim of agriculture is to provide food and fibre for the community (not consume fuel, energy, fodder and fertiliser). Accordingly, if we can produce the same amount of food and fibre (or more) using less fuel, fodder, fertiliser etc then not only are we minimising our impact on the climate but, through efficiency, providing more for the world and operating more profitably!
PIRSA has prepared two guides to climate and adaptation in South Australian agriculture. These are available on-line and in hard copy:
PIRSA has also researched the role of crop, pasture and soils management in sequestering atmospheric carbon and providing other benefits such as increased productivity and improved soil and ecosystem health. Soil carbon and climate change discussion paper (PDF 1.1MB).
For further information visit the South Australian Government website: Tackling climate change in South Australia (external site) and the Australian Government Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency (external site).
The following is adapted from Climate Change and the Grains Industry, appendix to The Future Environment for Grain Production by Rural Solutions South Australia.
The South Australian grains industry is highly sensitive to climatic conditions. The fortunes of both individual grain-growing enterprises in South Australia and the industries that support them suffer greatly during droughts and rely on profit from good seasons. The projected changes towards a hotter and drier climate are concerning, especially for low rainfall regions. Some of the negative impacts of climate change are likely to be compensated by the beneficial effect of increased carbon dioxide concentrations in the atmosphere.
The degree to which climate change will damage the grains industry depends on the amount of warming and the extent of the rainfall decline. Most adaptations to a warmer and drier environment such as conserving more water, improving water use efficiency, timely sowing and careful management of weeds, disease and nutrition are sensible practices for the grains industry in the absence of climate change. In other words they are no-regret adaptations.
Unlike fixed horticulture (e.g. a vineyard with a 30 year planning horizon) or irrigation systems, grain farming is an annual crop and in the past many growers have adapted to changes in the market and seasonal conditions.
The outlook is similar for most of the SA grains belt and can be summarised as follows:
Temperatures: In the grains region temperatures are projected to increase by 0.2 to 1.4°C by 2030 and 0.6 to 4.4°C by 2070. The projected changes are more or less uniform in each season with a slightly warmer outlook for spring. Model results indicate that future increases in daily maximum and minimum temperatures will be similar to the changes in average temperature. The frequency of extreme maximum temperatures will increase while the frequency of extreme minimum temperatures will decrease. The frequency of hot spells above 35°C and 40°C are projected to increase across most of the state
Rainfall: The drying trend and the uncertainty are much greater for 2070 than 2030. In general terms the strongest drying indications are for spring. Projections of annual potential evaporation indicate increases across the state with the largest increases seen in the ‘far-east’ and north-west of the state and the smallest increases in coastal regions around Adelaide and the Eyre Peninsula.
Average annual ‘water balance’ show deficits throughout the state with the largest values in the south-east of the state and the smallest in the west of the state. Despite decreases in average rainfall over most of South Australia in most seasons by 0% to 30%, extreme rainfall is found to increase by between 0% and 10%. All climate models show an increase in the frequency of droughts towards the end of the century.
The projected decline in rainfall, especially spring rainfall has obvious and negative implications for grain farming in the region. Recent events in the region such as the very hot and dry October 2004 and the run of poor starts to the winter cropping season, culminating in the exceptionally hot and dry Autumn of 2005, have focused attention on the vulnerability of even the best managed grain farms to hot spells and low rainfall.
Higher CO2 concentrations in the atmosphere are likely to lead to an increase in the water use efficiency in wheat production through an increase in photosynthesis (a process that builds plant carbohydrates and decrease in photorespiration (a process that uses plant carbohydrates). Overall indications are towards a modest increase in yields and decrease in protein levels of grain.
Costs: Pressure on the use of fossil fuels along with shortage of cheap oil could increase the cost of farm operations and energy intensive industries such as nitrogen fertilizer.
The grains industry in Australia is a small contributor to emissions making up only 2% of Agriculture compared to 67% from livestock, 10% from dairy and 21% from horticulture; hence significant changes in practice to reduce emissions are unlikely.
Even if greenhouse gas emissions were reduced to pre-industrial levels, some global warming is predicted and hence it is essential that some attention is paid to adaptation.
The UK Climate Impacts Programme (2003) points out that given the uncertainty of future climate change, the correct level of adaptation will always be difficult to determine. It is possible to under adapt (spend too little time and resources on adapting to worrying but uncertain climate change), to over adapt (spend too much of scarce resources) or to mal-adapt (use resources in a way that severely limit future adaptation options and/or adapt to a small set of future outcomes that are unlikely).
Howden (CSIRO, 2003) listed the following options for adaptation to climate change in the grains industry:
Tactical management opportunities included soil moisture monitoring, climate forecasting and constant reviewing of market conditions. All of these are practices that are likely to have benefit in the absence of climate change and relate to the overall push towards higher water use efficiency in the SA grains industry. These adaptations are no-regret adaptations and climate change only serves to highlight the urgency of improving water use efficiency.
There are however longer term decisions at a family farm level – to sell up, to buy more land, where to invest. These are especially pertinent for farmers in low rainfall regions and it is more difficult to find no-regret decisions. These decisions, along with industry infrastructure (silos etc) and industry support (drought policy) are hard decisions and need to be made in a transparent risk management framework.
In doing this, climate science needs to be clear about the uncertainty while also providing the risk assessment of a general trend towards hotter and probably drier conditions.